Look, I am really tired of all this. It is very emotionally taxing for nothing. It is not easy to argue in a foreign language about subtle topics. All I have tried to say is that there are language features based on extensive research. Erlang is one example, Go is another. There are obvious counter examples everyone know and love.
My first comment was about that by making an IO selector a language construct the need call Jetty which calls Netty, which call Shitty is eliminated, and the code could be reduced into a single function with a few helpers. This has been demonstrated by Rob Pike in every single fucking video on Youtube.
Creating another general purpose event-driven framework, Tokio or whatever, is, of course, very rewarding, especially for those imposers who call themselves "engineers", but it seems that engineering as a discipline is about reducing to an optimum, instead of piling up fancy bullshit. Every single video of Joe Armstrong on Youtube is about this very difference. We already have way too many Java frameworks.
We could actually compare into which assembly Go's code with select statement compiles versus Rust's code, including dependencies, but it is so obvious that it is almost frustrating to spell this explicitly. That is why I mentioned LOCs.
It is really frustrating to argue when some unknown idiots are flagging your posts without offering any single reason. BTW, if you want to know how shotings are originated - this is this exactly the way. But don't worry, I am very far away in some third world shithole, and I don't care that much.
In good old times, on LKML and everywhere else smart people would focus on meaning and ignore the style, which is one's own choice, while nowadays they attack our style, ignoring the meaning. So be it.
Just fuck this modern HN with all that SJW idiocy.
There is the discussion.
The fucking idiots are claiming, that some gut bacteria have been cured autism in a mice!
What the fuck is autism in mice? A cross-species disorder in a species with unrelated structure of the brain? Really?
I am struggling with autism my whole life, and some clowns are getting paid for "modeling" autism on unrelated species? Fuck you! Just fuck you fucking degenerates.
No wonder I have got banned. It is okay to be banned by idiots. There are my post which has been flagged by fucking SJW activists.
What kind of fucking bullshit is this? Autism is a spectrum of compensating behavioral patterns that emerge as the way to diminish unusually high emotional stress (which is also a spectrum) due to genetically transmitted "imbalances" in a brain's structure (and/or biochemistry). So, nowadays every kind of fucking bullshit deserve the label "working hypothesis" instead of "gross incompetence"? BTW, autistic spectrum disorders are "hijacked" the most stable evolutionary strategy of "good looks" - quiet village beauties are carrying these alleles (presumably, product of inbreeding).
There is no coincidence, that ASDs affects mostly boys. Motherly instincts, it seems, diminish (or compensate for) behavioral deviations.
If one could come down to earth from the Ivory towers of abstract bullshit and look at the real world, the answers are out there.
How this is related to humans?
What is autism in mice in the first place?
What kind of fucking degenerates are "studying" or "modeling" a cross-species >"mental" disorder???
On species with an almost unrelated brain structure as a "model"?? What kind of >bullshit is this?
In not so distant past many of weak-minded but talkative, ambitious and narcissistic people could have find their niche in any organized religion. Almost every fancy bullshit, as long as it fits the canon, could be accepted, praised and even rewarded. There were never a shortage of fancy bullshit. In the current age religions has been obsoleted, but weak-minded "creative" people are still here. So, science became a new religion, especially when it hit the wall of empiricism, a limitation, which has been realized by ancient eastern philosophers (Brahman is unattainable to conditioned intellect which could see nothing, but its conditioning). Modern day's notion of impossibility to break an abstraction barrier (see the wiring of a processor from the level of code) is the very same notion reformulated.
Every bizarre bullshit could be framed as a hypothesis and published, giving a high social status of "theoretical researches" to its authors (instead of much more appropriate status of talkative idiots). It is due to social status, similar to those of a monk in medieval ages, which one's parents could buy for their children by paying them through a costly elite religious school. Nothing new under the moon.
I personally prefer to see those disconnected from reality academics, who gave advice to Macron (based on disconnected from reality abstract notions) to tax the population to combat climate change, to be held accountable for all the damages caused by resulting riots and being forced to pay for their ignorant arrogance, but this will never happen, because academics are allowed to produce bullshit labeled as working hypothesis. The rest of us aren't.
The very first page shows an utter lack of conceptual discipline (sloopy thinking).
For instance, the following set of commands runs the hello_world example:
git clone https://github.com/SergioBenitez/Rocket cd Rocket git checkout v0.4.0-rc.2 cd examples/hello_world cargo run
Set implies no notion of ordering whatsoever, while a sequence of commands implies a particular definite order.
It is a list of commands, not a set. Don't use fancy words you not fully understand.